tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-694855878384792308.post4600958035538131448..comments2024-03-21T06:26:49.387-07:00Comments on Java67: How Constructor Chaining works in Java - Examplejavin paulhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15028902221295732276noreply@blogger.comBlogger10125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-694855878384792308.post-43281673221279488572020-04-19T19:23:36.328-07:002020-04-19T19:23:36.328-07:00but isn't that's the implicit call? you do...but isn't that's the implicit call? you don't need to declare that unless you are a calling a parametric constructor. javin paulhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15028902221295732276noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-694855878384792308.post-70068193203644856892020-04-18T11:17:00.353-07:002020-04-18T11:17:00.353-07:00There should be super() call inside Derived() defa...There should be super() call inside Derived() default constructor.Raj Singhhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02184473735487612337noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-694855878384792308.post-59619979084074261372017-11-08T19:38:46.327-08:002017-11-08T19:38:46.327-08:00In java the parent class is initialized internally...In java the parent class is initialized internally first before the derived calls is initialized so internally derived class has to make an implicit call if needed to super().<br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02607964087435706835noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-694855878384792308.post-9841657050639418422017-02-08T01:16:42.624-08:002017-02-08T01:16:42.624-08:00Whats the real need for providing a super() callin...Whats the real need for providing a super() calling by jvm..when we can call explicitly.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15630116993133152728noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-694855878384792308.post-1607526813276118332016-11-20T20:08:54.694-08:002016-11-20T20:08:54.694-08:00Check the .class file you shall see the default co...Check the .class file you shall see the default constructor created in your file.Prashanthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08785170234901143054noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-694855878384792308.post-71904619283080228502016-11-20T20:06:25.904-08:002016-11-20T20:06:25.904-08:00Java implicitly adds a no argument constructor in ...Java implicitly adds a no argument constructor in your class. That's why no compile time error.Prashanthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08785170234901143054noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-694855878384792308.post-17727968305563963922015-12-20T11:47:40.564-08:002015-12-20T11:47:40.564-08:00Why does another constructor call has to be the fi...Why does another constructor call has to be the first statement? Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09230095966858408953noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-694855878384792308.post-51928270184617246952015-10-22T20:40:27.374-07:002015-10-22T20:40:27.374-07:00I am using eclipse IDE and I have not declare any ...I am using eclipse IDE and I have not declare any default constructor in both class then also I am successfully able to execute my program. I don't know where default constrcutor is needed ? Is it I am not getting compile time error because I m using IDE <br /><br />package com.corejava.oops;<br /><br />class ABC{<br /> void add(){<br /> System.out.println("Add");<br /> }<br />}<br /><br />class BCB extends ABC{<br /> void add(){<br /> System.out.println("BCB Add");<br /> }<br /> void add1(){<br /> System.out.println("BCB Add1");<br /> }<br />}<br />public class NoArugmentCostructorBothSuperAndSubClass {<br /> public static void main(String args[]){<br /> ABC a = new BCB();<br /> a.add();<br /> BCB b = new BCB();<br /> b.add1();<br /> }<br />}Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-694855878384792308.post-86546979827203991362015-09-22T11:52:57.721-07:002015-09-22T11:52:57.721-07:00What is the need for this chaining any way?What is the need for this chaining any way?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-694855878384792308.post-12303657611297182092015-03-10T04:42:00.043-07:002015-03-10T04:42:00.043-07:00Thank you for this!Thank you for this!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com